Laptop
Posted: Mon Aug 19, 2024 5:03 pm
I am weighing the pros and cons of MASSO vs Acorn for my small 4-axis mill rebuild. There is not a ton of space inside the unit and my intention is to keep it as self contained as possible. I want all the controls inside the existing control box, because the design is really nice and allows you to remove the box for easy testing on a bench. All cabling into and out of the box would be on connectors so it's much easier to work on. This setup keeps everything nicely self-contained and away from any coolant/dust/etc.
However, there is no way to fit an Acorn board, relay board, mini PC, power supplies, and 4 stepper drivers in the control box, unless the Mini PC isn't there and I use a laptop. This would heavily favor Centroid in my decision making process, because I happen to have two capable laptops here at work that aren't being used right now, and would be more than powerful enough to run CNC12. The mill also has a built-in laptop shelf on a swing arm because the original controls used a laptop.
Cost-wise, with a Mini PC, Pro software upgrade, etc, the two setups are about the same. If i remove the mini PC from the equation, the Centroid gets the edge because I already have a laptop.
Alternatively, while slightly more expensive, MASSO fits along with all the other stuff since it doesn't require the PC.
So how hard and fast is this no-laptop-no-support rule? I can't for the life of me fathom why a laptop that meets the CPU specs and has an ethernet port wouldn't be acceptable. I get that laptops have power saving options that could be problematic, but if this is powered by AC and not the battery, all that power saving stuff can be disabled in the BIOS or Windows.
However, there is no way to fit an Acorn board, relay board, mini PC, power supplies, and 4 stepper drivers in the control box, unless the Mini PC isn't there and I use a laptop. This would heavily favor Centroid in my decision making process, because I happen to have two capable laptops here at work that aren't being used right now, and would be more than powerful enough to run CNC12. The mill also has a built-in laptop shelf on a swing arm because the original controls used a laptop.
Cost-wise, with a Mini PC, Pro software upgrade, etc, the two setups are about the same. If i remove the mini PC from the equation, the Centroid gets the edge because I already have a laptop.
Alternatively, while slightly more expensive, MASSO fits along with all the other stuff since it doesn't require the PC.
So how hard and fast is this no-laptop-no-support rule? I can't for the life of me fathom why a laptop that meets the CPU specs and has an ethernet port wouldn't be acceptable. I get that laptops have power saving options that could be problematic, but if this is powered by AC and not the battery, all that power saving stuff can be disabled in the BIOS or Windows.