Re: 325 Limit Error?
Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2021 9:00 pm
I was seeing the failure in less than 20 minutes. After rewiring, I went for 30 minutes with no failure. This doesn't constitute proof that it is fixed but is certainly a good sign.
Here are a few pictures of what I have now. They show:
* EStop run in two-conductor shielded cable with the shield connected only at the enclosure case (IN8)
* All home sensors are now in parallel with three-conductor shielded cable with the shield connected only at the enclosure case (IN1).
* ProbeTripped run in two-conductor shielded cable with the shield connected only at the enclosure case (IN7)
* On each motor driver, the PULSE + and - wires are twisted together. Same for the DIR+ and -
One deviation from the schematic is where the Pulse and Direction current flows. As shown in the schematic, I can trace the current path starting at Pulse +. The current flows through the opto inside the driver and exits Pulse -. From there, it flows through the DB-25 cable, through a saturated NPN, and into COM. From COM it flows into the negative terminal of the 5V supply. Out of this supply, it flows OUTSIDE of the DB-25 cable to the Pulse+ terminal. That wire from the 5V supply to the drivers is unshielded and unpaired to the rest of the signal path.
I'm sure this is fine if the drive is in the same box as the Acorn. But in my configuration, they are in separate boxes.
Instead, down at my driver box, I first connected each of the COM terminals of the DB-25 connector to a common point. The common point connects to the negative terminal of my floating 5V supply. The positive terminal connects to a common point that fans out to all of the + terminals. OK, it is a short daisy chain.
With this configuration, the current flowing into COM in the Acorn flows back on the many COM wires in the DB-25. In this way, the return path is paired with the signal and is inside the shield. Down at the drivers, the current flows out of the COM wires, into the floating 5V supply's negative terminal, out the positive terminal, and into the Pulse + and Dir+ terminals. By connecting to all of the COM wires, its inductance is minimized.
Even if the problem has only been reduced, I believe I'm on the right track now. Thanks to all that provided guidance.
Rick
Here are a few pictures of what I have now. They show:
* EStop run in two-conductor shielded cable with the shield connected only at the enclosure case (IN8)
* All home sensors are now in parallel with three-conductor shielded cable with the shield connected only at the enclosure case (IN1).
* ProbeTripped run in two-conductor shielded cable with the shield connected only at the enclosure case (IN7)
* On each motor driver, the PULSE + and - wires are twisted together. Same for the DIR+ and -
One deviation from the schematic is where the Pulse and Direction current flows. As shown in the schematic, I can trace the current path starting at Pulse +. The current flows through the opto inside the driver and exits Pulse -. From there, it flows through the DB-25 cable, through a saturated NPN, and into COM. From COM it flows into the negative terminal of the 5V supply. Out of this supply, it flows OUTSIDE of the DB-25 cable to the Pulse+ terminal. That wire from the 5V supply to the drivers is unshielded and unpaired to the rest of the signal path.
I'm sure this is fine if the drive is in the same box as the Acorn. But in my configuration, they are in separate boxes.
Instead, down at my driver box, I first connected each of the COM terminals of the DB-25 connector to a common point. The common point connects to the negative terminal of my floating 5V supply. The positive terminal connects to a common point that fans out to all of the + terminals. OK, it is a short daisy chain.
With this configuration, the current flowing into COM in the Acorn flows back on the many COM wires in the DB-25. In this way, the return path is paired with the signal and is inside the shield. Down at the drivers, the current flows out of the COM wires, into the floating 5V supply's negative terminal, out the positive terminal, and into the Pulse + and Dir+ terminals. By connecting to all of the COM wires, its inductance is minimized.
Even if the problem has only been reduced, I believe I'm on the right track now. Thanks to all that provided guidance.
Rick