Comparison of cheap touch probes
Moderator: cnckeith
-
- Posts: 809
- Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2018 2:52 pm
- Acorn CNC Controller: Yes
- Allin1DC CNC Controller: No
- Oak CNC controller: No
- CNC Control System Serial Number: 38D269594F9C-0110180512
- DC3IOB: No
- CNC12: Yes
- CNC11: No
- CPU10 or CPU7: No
- Location: UK
- Contact:
Re: Comparison of cheap touch probes
The inner bore of a ball bearing race will be deadly accurate by our standards and they are usually a nice round number.
(Note: Liking will "up vote" a post in the search results helping others find good information faster)
-
- Posts: 603
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 11:15 am
- Acorn CNC Controller: Yes
- Allin1DC CNC Controller: No
- Oak CNC controller: No
- CNC Control System Serial Number: 985DADEB24D5-0309180716
- DC3IOB: No
- CNC11: No
- CPU10 or CPU7: No
Re: Comparison of cheap touch probes
Just an FYI that the ProbeApp V3 has now a Touch Probe Calibration cycle included. Very simple to run and no need to calculate numbers and set parameters manually as all is done automatically by the calibration cycle.rk9268vc wrote: ↑Sat Aug 28, 2021 6:45 pmThanks! that's a great idea. Ill just take apart the cable plug and solder on a jumper.martyscncgarage wrote: ↑Thu Aug 26, 2021 7:59 pm Make a connector. Probe side has the jumper that shorts the probe or tool touch off detect.
Also, I noticed in your wonderful Touch Probe Configuration video [
that you used a ring gage to set the probe pre-travel.
Would it be possible to use something round, like a brass pipe fitting or extrusion instead of a ring gage? Since you repeat the test until it is repeatable?
thanks for the help!
You even have the option to calibrate for bore dimension accuracy or overall average accuracy and if you don't know what the difference is, check out my post here: ProbeApp V3: Test and Improve Touch Probe Accuracy
-swissi
If you are using any Probing Device, a Rack ATC or want a more efficient Work Flow, check out CHIPS
Contact me at swissi2000@gmail.com
Contact me at swissi2000@gmail.com
(Note: Liking will "up vote" a post in the search results helping others find good information faster)
-
- Posts: 267
- Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2020 4:12 pm
- Acorn CNC Controller: Yes
- Allin1DC CNC Controller: No
- Oak CNC controller: No
- CNC Control System Serial Number: none
- DC3IOB: No
- CNC12: Yes
- CNC11: No
- CPU10 or CPU7: No
Re: Comparison of cheap touch probes
Yeah, I think youre right.
I found 2 decent ones, a .74975 and a 1.9450
which would work better? I know it says to go with a 1" but is it better to be a little over or under or does it not matter?
Thanks
(Note: Liking will "up vote" a post in the search results helping others find good information faster)
-
- Community Expert
- Posts: 9953
- Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2017 12:01 pm
- Acorn CNC Controller: Yes
- Allin1DC CNC Controller: Yes
- Oak CNC controller: No
- CNC Control System Serial Number: none
- DC3IOB: No
- CNC12: Yes
- CNC11: Yes
- CPU10 or CPU7: Yes
- Location: Mesa, AZ
Re: Comparison of cheap touch probes
I believe you just need one with known value
Reminder, for support please follow this post: viewtopic.php?f=20&t=383
We can't "SEE" what you see...
Mesa, AZ
We can't "SEE" what you see...
Mesa, AZ
(Note: Liking will "up vote" a post in the search results helping others find good information faster)
-
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 8:23 am
- Acorn CNC Controller: Yes
- Allin1DC CNC Controller: No
- Oak CNC controller: No
- CNC Control System Serial Number: 1702
- DC3IOB: No
- CNC12: Yes
- CNC11: No
- CPU10 or CPU7: No
Re: Comparison of cheap touch probes
I would go with the smaller one. You can go through the probing routine faster.
(Note: Liking will "up vote" a post in the search results helping others find good information faster)
-
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2020 8:23 am
- Acorn CNC Controller: Yes
- Allin1DC CNC Controller: No
- Oak CNC controller: No
- CNC Control System Serial Number: 1702
- DC3IOB: No
- CNC12: Yes
- CNC11: No
- CPU10 or CPU7: No
Re: Comparison of cheap touch probes
I am using a 2 wire probe. I would not ever consider running it without "probe connected" input especially for a beginner. I am running a third party probe. It works well mostly but once in a while I find the position is a bit off. If I'm setting up a critical part I run the probe app twice to make sure that the position is the same both times. It usually is. Point I want to make is that it's probably best to buy the Centroid probe if you can afford it. If something big ever happens to the probe I have now it will be replaced with the Centroid one.
The way my probe connected input is wired is through the probe jack at the control end. I'm using a stereo type jack the ones people use for old style headphones. When you insert the jack into the socket it shorts out a set of contacts and this indicates probe connected. The jacks I have came from old telecom equipment so I'm not sure if this style is common or not.
My normal way of using it is to first connect the cable for the probe to the control unit. This provides protection for the probe even though it's not connected yet. Then I put the probe in the spindle and connect the cable. Then I do whatever probing routine I need to set up using Swissi's probe app. After I'm done I remove the probe from the spindle then disconnect the cable.
(Note: Liking will "up vote" a post in the search results helping others find good information faster)