Re: Acorn & PC Division of Tasks
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2018 11:19 pm
mikes...
When you say: "I am sorry, but I am not so sure that because it is heavier, it is harder.", I believe I would have to categorically disagree.
Imagine a low or no load complex toolpath. Your signature on a whiteboard for example. Your brain is able to take feedback from your body in a similar fashion to encoders on a given axis. Perform the following test: Write your name on a whiteboard 10 times. Each time add 1 pound of weight to your wrist and increase the speed. Remember that your mind will perform the recalcs easier than most computers of normal specs.
Remember that speed, mass and load will all complicate perfect trajectories, especially when the load is a variable, unknown and often changing. That is the major difference between additive and subtractive machining. With additive machining the mass and load are virtually fixed, so all that needs to be calculated is speed for the medium and special start/stop parameters.
When you say: "I am sorry, but I am not so sure that because it is heavier, it is harder.", I believe I would have to categorically disagree.
Imagine a low or no load complex toolpath. Your signature on a whiteboard for example. Your brain is able to take feedback from your body in a similar fashion to encoders on a given axis. Perform the following test: Write your name on a whiteboard 10 times. Each time add 1 pound of weight to your wrist and increase the speed. Remember that your mind will perform the recalcs easier than most computers of normal specs.
Remember that speed, mass and load will all complicate perfect trajectories, especially when the load is a variable, unknown and often changing. That is the major difference between additive and subtractive machining. With additive machining the mass and load are virtually fixed, so all that needs to be calculated is speed for the medium and special start/stop parameters.