KP3 Error or Mill? <Solved, Probe issue>
Moderator: cnckeith
-
- Community Expert
- Posts: 3539
- Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2016 10:03 am
- Acorn CNC Controller: Yes
- Allin1DC CNC Controller: Yes
- Oak CNC controller: Yes
- CNC Control System Serial Number: 100505
100327
102696
103432
7804732B977B-0624192192 - DC3IOB: No
- CNC12: Yes
- CNC11: No
- CPU10 or CPU7: No
- Location: Boston, MA
- Contact:
Re: KP3 Error or Mill? <Solved, Probe issue>
Just remember, you are not measuring the probe. You are measuring the probe PLUS your machine. We all have delusions on how accurate our machines are.
Cheers,
Tom
Confidence is the feeling you have before you fully understand the situation.
I have CDO. It's like OCD, but the letters are where they should be.
Tom
Confidence is the feeling you have before you fully understand the situation.
I have CDO. It's like OCD, but the letters are where they should be.
1 user liked this post
(Note: Liking will "up vote" a post in the search results helping others find good information faster)
(Note: Liking will "up vote" a post in the search results helping others find good information faster)
-
- Posts: 749
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2020 8:41 pm
- Acorn CNC Controller: Yes
- Allin1DC CNC Controller: No
- Oak CNC controller: No
- CNC Control System Serial Number: none
- DC3IOB: No
- CNC12: Yes
- CNC11: No
- CPU10 or CPU7: No
- Location: Arizona
Re: KP3 Error or Mill? <Solved, Probe issue>
I re-checked the concentricity of the probe and sure enough it was considerably off, confirming my guess that I did not tighten the adjustment screws on the probe adequately. I fixed these and eliminated virtually all probe run-out.
I repeated the calibration test and got better overall results (I also rotated the probe) and the x and y measurements are now fairly close:
Error: -.00049
X Diameter: .99787
Y Diameter: .99959
I then repeatedly measured the z height of the top of the calibration ring setting z axis reference to zero on the first iteration. Here are the results:
.0011
.0008
-.0001
-.0003
.0007
.0006
At the beginning of this post, I had a faulty probe, and it was not measuring z heights consistently. To test the mill Uwe had me perform the test show below. With a .0005 dial test indicator, the mill returned to the exact same position each time, confirming that the probe needed to be sent info repairs and the mill was performing properly. Now, with a repaired probe there is total variance between the z height measurements of .0014 which is double the Z Repeatability results that came with the repaired probe of .00017
Any ideas on this?
Move the head to a similar position like with the probe. Set the dial indicator to 0 set Z to zero
MDI:
G1 Z0.1 F5
G1 Z0 F5
Repeat several times.
Uwe
I repeated the calibration test and got better overall results (I also rotated the probe) and the x and y measurements are now fairly close:
Error: -.00049
X Diameter: .99787
Y Diameter: .99959
I then repeatedly measured the z height of the top of the calibration ring setting z axis reference to zero on the first iteration. Here are the results:
.0011
.0008
-.0001
-.0003
.0007
.0006
At the beginning of this post, I had a faulty probe, and it was not measuring z heights consistently. To test the mill Uwe had me perform the test show below. With a .0005 dial test indicator, the mill returned to the exact same position each time, confirming that the probe needed to be sent info repairs and the mill was performing properly. Now, with a repaired probe there is total variance between the z height measurements of .0014 which is double the Z Repeatability results that came with the repaired probe of .00017
Any ideas on this?
Move the head to a similar position like with the probe. Set the dial indicator to 0 set Z to zero
MDI:
G1 Z0.1 F5
G1 Z0 F5
Repeat several times.
Uwe
(Note: Liking will "up vote" a post in the search results helping others find good information faster)