Figured I owe everyone an update.
The mill is back to making chips.
Thanks for all the help and input and putting up with me.
I will be back soon....
Search found 67 matches
- Sat May 13, 2023 10:43 am
- Forum: Centroid Oak, Allin1DC, MPU11 and Legacy products
- Topic: Acer e-Mill Anilam to AllIn1DC conversion build
- Replies: 87
- Views: 7656
- Wed Apr 12, 2023 6:11 pm
- Forum: Centroid Oak, Allin1DC, MPU11 and Legacy products
- Topic: Acer e-Mill Anilam to AllIn1DC conversion build
- Replies: 87
- Views: 7656
Re: Acer e-Mill Anilam to AllIn1DC conversion build
Really? That is how you pass the test?
No interaction or acknowledgement on screen?
Finally I can make parts again?
No interaction or acknowledgement on screen?
Finally I can make parts again?
- Wed Apr 12, 2023 6:07 pm
- Forum: Centroid Oak, Allin1DC, MPU11 and Legacy products
- Topic: Acer e-Mill Anilam to AllIn1DC conversion build
- Replies: 87
- Views: 7656
Re: Acer e-Mill Anilam to AllIn1DC conversion build
Now the system "Test"
After pressing Cycle Start
Outputs 306 Job Finished without doing a darn thing.
No errors no movement
After pressing Cycle Start
Outputs 306 Job Finished without doing a darn thing.
No errors no movement
- Wed Apr 12, 2023 5:57 pm
- Forum: Centroid Oak, Allin1DC, MPU11 and Legacy products
- Topic: Acer e-Mill Anilam to AllIn1DC conversion build
- Replies: 87
- Views: 7656
Re: Acer e-Mill Anilam to AllIn1DC conversion build
Figured a way around the error.
- Wed Apr 12, 2023 5:48 pm
- Forum: Centroid Oak, Allin1DC, MPU11 and Legacy products
- Topic: Acer e-Mill Anilam to AllIn1DC conversion build
- Replies: 87
- Views: 7656
Re: Acer e-Mill Anilam to AllIn1DC conversion build
I am starting to get frustrated 3 times today I started with page one. worked through to page 71. Keep getting stuck with 907 X axis travel exceeded. I am on step 5 of 6.11 Software travel limits in the instructions.
- Wed Apr 12, 2023 11:30 am
- Forum: Centroid Oak, Allin1DC, MPU11 and Legacy products
- Topic: Acer e-Mill Anilam to AllIn1DC conversion build
- Replies: 87
- Views: 7656
Re: Acer e-Mill Anilam to AllIn1DC conversion build
I do not disagree with you at all. My issue is that the test was performed and the message cleared, but then it returned. Upon attempting to run the tests again I get an error about a missing parameter. When investigating that parameter error I find that the test actually just failed for reason &quo...
- Tue Apr 11, 2023 8:27 am
- Forum: Centroid Oak, Allin1DC, MPU11 and Legacy products
- Topic: Acer e-Mill Anilam to AllIn1DC conversion build
- Replies: 87
- Views: 7656
Re: Acer e-Mill Anilam to AllIn1DC conversion build
It's back?
Machine setup
Not completed.
Machine is not ready
to run.
Contact your dealer.
Machine setup
Not completed.
Machine is not ready
to run.
Contact your dealer.
- Sun Apr 09, 2023 8:00 pm
- Forum: Centroid Oak, Allin1DC, MPU11 and Legacy products
- Topic: Acer e-Mill Anilam to AllIn1DC conversion build
- Replies: 87
- Views: 7656
Re: Acer e-Mill Anilam to AllIn1DC conversion build
Eureka!
Faulty contactor.
Moved wires from L1/T1 to unused L3/T3.
We have a working spindle now.
Faulty contactor.
Moved wires from L1/T1 to unused L3/T3.
We have a working spindle now.
- Sun Apr 09, 2023 2:30 pm
- Forum: Centroid Oak, Allin1DC, MPU11 and Legacy products
- Topic: Acer e-Mill Anilam to AllIn1DC conversion build
- Replies: 87
- Views: 7656
Re: Acer e-Mill Anilam to AllIn1DC conversion build
Well the message at startup is gone! Guess I have a working system....well other than the spindle. Who needs a spinning spindle on a CNC mill anyway huh'?
Now to go figure this part out.. Happy Easter
Now to go figure this part out.. Happy Easter
- Sun Apr 09, 2023 2:18 pm
- Forum: Centroid Oak, Allin1DC, MPU11 and Legacy products
- Topic: Acer e-Mill Anilam to AllIn1DC conversion build
- Replies: 87
- Views: 7656
Re: Acer e-Mill Anilam to AllIn1DC conversion build
Went back and double checked the limits...all work correctly. Goes through the test cycle with no error. Until the program gets to line 1020 and says there is a missing parameter. When I look at the code do not see any issues with that line. When looking at the output for the test results it is stil...